WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:06.660 --> 00:00:11.960
I find religion fascinating. So even
though I'm not religious myself,

00:00:11.970 --> 00:00:16.530
I think it's possibly the most
interesting thing that you can learn

00:00:16.530 --> 00:00:23.789
about, think critically about, and
understand. I enjoy teaching the sort of

00:00:23.789 --> 00:00:27.810
broad spectrum of the variety of
religious faith that exists and has

00:00:27.810 --> 00:00:31.949
existed in the world but also the
different perspectives that you can

00:00:31.949 --> 00:00:37.800
study those beliefs from, so the
theologies and the philosophies and the

00:00:37.800 --> 00:00:43.770
ethics of various religions but equally
the histories and how those histories

00:00:43.770 --> 00:00:48.289
have shaped our ways of thinking today
in the modern world and also,

00:00:48.289 --> 00:00:53.240
sociologically, how religious diversity
and the different religious narratives

00:00:53.240 --> 00:00:58.580
that exist across the world today, how
they impact on global politics and people's lives.

00:01:03.540 --> 00:01:09.520
I think, whether you are religious or not,
understanding religion is vital to be a

00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:15.610
good citizen in the 21st century. If we
look at what's going on in the world at

00:01:15.610 --> 00:01:20.020
the moment in terms of conflict in the
Middle East or climate change or

00:01:20.020 --> 00:01:24.790
whatever the pressing issues might be,
there are religious elements to all of

00:01:24.790 --> 00:01:28.590
those, all of those issues. And I think if
you want to be a fully functioning,

00:01:28.590 --> 00:01:34.900
successful member of society, a global
citizen, then you need to understand religion.

00:01:40.040 --> 00:01:47.420
I think from from a humanist perspective
good RE would be pluralistic, it would be

00:01:47.430 --> 00:01:55.400
critical, it would be dialogical, in that
it would ask questions and it would

00:01:55.400 --> 00:02:02.670
discuss the responses to those questions.
There are some facts that we that we

00:02:02.670 --> 00:02:06.090
have to teach; there are certain events
that have happened in history that

00:02:06.090 --> 00:02:09.869
are factual. But a lot of the content
that we study is surrounding belief, and

00:02:09.869 --> 00:02:14.630
I think some kind of dialogue that
allows those beliefs to be explored

00:02:14.630 --> 00:02:20.340
critically is what makes good RE.
I think the steps that we need to take

00:02:20.340 --> 00:02:25.110
to make sure that RE is sort of fit for
purpose in the in the 21st century, that

00:02:25.110 --> 00:02:29.670
is going to send young people out into
the world as sort of global citizens who

00:02:29.670 --> 00:02:35.880
are religiously literate, is an RE that
is pluralistic - that gives them knowledge -

00:02:35.880 --> 00:02:41.130
but also allows them to engage
critically with the knowledge that they

00:02:41.130 --> 00:02:46.739
have, that allows them to not just learn
the RE that their local community decide

00:02:46.739 --> 00:02:50.880
thanks to the vagaries of the of the law
that governs the subjects, but a law that

00:02:50.880 --> 00:02:55.410
we can as experts and teachers agree
upon that is national and that is

00:02:55.410 --> 00:03:00.540
outward looking in terms of its global
face and therefore would allow those

00:03:00.540 --> 00:03:04.019
young people to go out and live and
interact with people in the world and

00:03:04.020 --> 00:03:07.860
understands the plurality and the
diversity of belief in the world.

00:03:12.700 --> 00:03:17.640
I think humanism certainly has a place
with within RE, I think the humanist

00:03:17.650 --> 00:03:22.690
sort of definition that this is a
positive philosophy, a positive way of

00:03:22.690 --> 00:03:27.430
life and finding meaning in the universe
without the need for the supernatural,

00:03:27.430 --> 00:03:32.830
without a need for for god. I think, if we
look at the recent social attitudes data

00:03:32.830 --> 00:03:38.820
that's come out recently I think it's 74% of
17 to 24 year-olds identify as being

00:03:38.820 --> 00:03:43.450
non-religious. And to help those students
who might not understand where their

00:03:43.450 --> 00:03:47.650
ideas have come from or who has shaped
those sort of non-theistic ideas that

00:03:47.650 --> 00:03:51.970
they might be having, we need to have an
education that gives them the mental

00:03:51.970 --> 00:03:56.320
historical, philosophical framework to
position themselves.

00:04:01.080 --> 00:04:05.500
I think those people who claim that
religion has no place in schools and

00:04:05.500 --> 00:04:10.330
that religion shouldn't be taught in
schools are really not understanding the

00:04:10.330 --> 00:04:13.659
argument. Now there might be valid
arguments to say that we shouldn't have

00:04:13.659 --> 00:04:19.030
compulsory Christian collective worship
in schools, for instance, and I would probably agree

00:04:19.030 --> 00:04:23.280
with that. But I think religion, to be
studied critically, to be studied

00:04:23.280 --> 00:04:28.470
academically, alongside history, geography
and art, and English, is a subject that

00:04:28.470 --> 00:04:33.280
enriches students lives, it enriches
students understanding. Teachers do not

00:04:33.280 --> 00:04:38.500
take a a proselytising approach. Good
RE teachers will take a critical and an

00:04:38.500 --> 00:04:42.220
objective approach to the teaching of
the subject. And that's why, I said, I

00:04:42.220 --> 00:04:47.420
would say to that person who's cynical about it: 
'Come and see good RE being taught in schools.'

